Cooper B. Holmes
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
Papers in
-
- Color perception and design 6
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 13
- Co-authors
- Michael Howard (1 shared paper)Donna Anderson (1 shared paper)Philip S. Holzman (1 shared paper)Christopher Joseph (1 shared paper)Timothy A. Post (1 shared paper)Matthew Schrader (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Psychology (11 papers)The Journal of Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)American Psychologist (2 papers)Psychological Reports (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cooper B. Holmes
53 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Applied Psychology 41
- General Psychology 11
- Social Psychology 156
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
- Clinical Psychology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Cooper B. Holmes
This map shows the geographic impact of Cooper B. Holmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cooper B. Holmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cooper B. Holmes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cooper B. Holmes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cooper B. Holmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cooper B. Holmes. The network helps show where Cooper B. Holmes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Cooper B. Holmes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 46 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 14 | The Honest Truth About Lying With Statistics | 1990 | 10 |
| 15 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 7 |
About Cooper B. Holmes
Cooper B. Holmes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 56 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (13 papers), Color perception and design (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (41 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Social Psychology (156 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations) and Clinical Psychology (118 citations). Cooper B. Holmes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Howard, Donna Anderson, Philip S. Holzman, Christopher Joseph, Timothy A. Post and Matthew Schrader. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, American Psychologist and Psychological Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.