Constantine Partasides

754 citations
7 papers · 133 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Constantine Partasides

6 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

Constantine Partasides
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Strategy and Management 111
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 38
  • Law 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 79
  • Accounting 9
Replace Nigel Blackaby with:
Nigel Blackaby United States
Loukas Mistelis United Kingdom
Julian D. M. Lew United Kingdom
Daniel Behn Norway
Charles N. Brower United States
Margrete Stevens United States
Caroline Henckels Australia
Eric De Brabandere Hungary
Horatia Muir Watt France
Giorgio Sacerdoti Italy
Constantine Partasides relative to Nigel Blackaby United States Nigel Blackaby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nigel Blackaby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constantine Partasides

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constantine Partasides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constantine Partasides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constantine Partasides more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constantine Partasides

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constantine Partasides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constantine Partasides. The network helps show where Constantine Partasides may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Constantine Partasides, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constantine Partasides Line = papers co-authored together Constantine Partasides links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 200965
2 201553
3 20227
4 20026
5 20171
6 20071
7
Ordre public, concurrence et arbitrage
20060

About Constantine Partasides

Constantine Partasides is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (7 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (3 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (1 paper), Legal principles and applications (1 paper), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper), European and International Law Studies (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and Corporate Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (111 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (38 citations), Law (33 citations), Political Science and International Relations (79 citations) and Accounting (9 citations). Constantine Partasides has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Alan Redfern, Martín Hunter, Nigel Blackaby and George Nicholas. Their work appears in journals such as Arbitration International and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact