Constance Newman

48 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Constance Newman
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Business and International Management 38
  • Gender Studies 172
  • Safety Research 108
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100
  • General Health Professions 228
Replace Elena Glinskaya with:
Elena Glinskaya United States
Rekha Mehra United States
Mary Arends‐Kuenning United States
Jill L. Findeis United States
Ana Lúcia Kassouf Brazil
Shalini Roy United States
Clement Ahiadeke Ghana
Kenda Cunningham United States
Minh Cong Nguyen United States
Esha Sraboni United States
Constance Newman relative to Elena Glinskaya United States Elena Glinskaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Elena Glinskaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Newman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Newman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Newman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Newman. The network helps show where Constance Newman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance Newman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Newman Line = papers co-authored together Constance Newman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001161
2 201164
3 200747
4 200247
5 200841
6 200824
7 201722
8 199920
9 201119
10 201118
11 201717
12 201615
13
Gender, time use, and change : impacts of agricultural export employment in Ecuador
200114
14 202311
15 202111
16 200410
17 20169
18 20128
19 20158
20 20008

About Constance Newman

Constance Newman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 50 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (17 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (15 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (14 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (8 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers) and HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (38 citations), Gender Studies (172 citations), Safety Research (108 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (100 citations) and General Health Professions (228 citations). Constance Newman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Uganda and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sudharshan Canagarajah, Lisa Mancino, Katherine Ralston, Daniel H. de Vries, Joanne F. Guthrie, Jessica E. Todd, Jean C. Buzby, Michele Ver Ploeg, Linda Fogarty and Lucia N. Makoae. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resources for Health, The World Bank Economic Review, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior and International Journal for Equity in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact