Conrad Joyner

543 citations
18 papers · 283 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism 6
    • American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
    • Populism, Right-Wing Movements 1
    • Political Science Research and Education 1
  • Law 2
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2

Conrad Joyner

15 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Conrad Joyner
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Political Science and International Relations 140
  • Communication 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 151
  • Public Administration 10
  • Gender Studies 18
Replace Herbert Passin with:
Herbert Passin United States
Eugene Burdick United States
Walter Berns United States
Peter C. Sederberg United States
Hugo Young United States
Peter McDonough United States
Gary R. Orren United States
Hans Haferkamp Germany
Carl P. Hensler United States
Anton Pelinka Austria
Conrad Joyner relative to Herbert Passin United States Herbert Passin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Herbert Passin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Joyner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Joyner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Joyner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Joyner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Joyner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Joyner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Joyner. The network helps show where Conrad Joyner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Conrad Joyner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conrad Joyner Line = papers co-authored together Conrad Joyner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1963149
2 196533
3 196620
4 196318
5 197115
6 196913
7 196611
8 19699
9
The Commonwealth and monopolies
19633
10 19673
11 19582
12 19681
13 19621
14 19601
15 19631
16 19661
17 19651
18 19791

About Conrad Joyner

Conrad Joyner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Public Administration, having authored 18 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (1 paper), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Political Science Research and Education (1 paper) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (140 citations), Communication (33 citations), Sociology and Political Science (151 citations), Public Administration (10 citations) and Gender Studies (18 citations). Conrad Joyner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Lane, Frank J. Sorauf, David E. Apter, William C. Mitchell, Dan Nimmo, William D. Coplin and James David Barber. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Midwest Journal of Political Science and The Western Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact