Connie Chen

776 citations
31 papers · 490 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Connie Chen

26 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Connie Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Applied Psychology 100
  • General Health Professions 130
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Health Information Management 11
Replace Chaitali Sinha with:
Chaitali Sinha Canada
Floor Sieverink Netherlands
Antonia Arnaert Canada
Maddalena Fiordelli Switzerland
Sarah Ibrahim Canada
Audrey Boruvka Canada
Esther Granado‐Font Spain
Apichai Wattanapisit Thailand
Micah T. Prochaska United States
Konstantinos Antypas Norway
Connie Chen relative to Chaitali Sinha Canada Chaitali Sinha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Chaitali Sinha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Connie Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Chen. The network helps show where Connie Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Connie Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Connie Chen Line = papers co-authored together Connie Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201278
2 201761
3 200756
4 202044
5 201434
6 201929
7 202028
8 201227
9 202021
10 201716
11 202015
12 202214
13 202113
14 20218
15 20227
16 20107
17 20226
18 20216
19 20235
20 20214

About Connie Chen

Connie Chen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (15 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (100 citations), General Health Professions (130 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Health Information Management (11 citations). Connie Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Anita Lungu, Ida Sim, J. Nwando Olayiwola, Rita F. Redberg, Julia E. Hoffman, Sanket S. Dhruva, Joshua Selsky, David Haddad, Richard L. Kravitz and Yan Leykin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Value in Health and Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact