Congtian Lin
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Developmental Biology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 13
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Liqiang Ji (15 shared papers)Jiangning Wang (5 shared papers)Huijie Qiao (3 shared papers)Zhigang Jiang (2 shared papers)Na Zhao (1 shared paper)Zhengwang Zhang (1 shared paper)Wenjuan Wang (1 shared paper)Bin Gao (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2 papers)Ecological Informatics (2 papers)Animals (1 paper)Biodiversity and Conservation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Congtian Lin
19 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ecological Modeling 108
- Developmental Biology 25
- Insect Science 48
- Ecology 98
- Genetics 93
Countries citing papers authored by Congtian Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Congtian Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Congtian Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Congtian Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Congtian Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Congtian Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Congtian Lin. The network helps show where Congtian Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Congtian Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 139 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Congtian Lin
Congtian Lin is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (108 citations), Developmental Biology (25 citations), Insect Science (48 citations), Ecology (98 citations) and Genetics (93 citations). Congtian Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Liqiang Ji, Jiangning Wang, Huijie Qiao, Zhigang Jiang, Na Zhao, Zhengwang Zhang, Wenjuan Wang, Bin Gao, Xiaojun Yang and Chuanyin Dai. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Ecological Informatics, Animals and Biodiversity and Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.