Cong Ye

1.4k citations
36 papers · 1.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Ye

34 papers receiving 958 citations

Cong Ye's Hit Papers

The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys 2012 · 354 citations
3540+4+9Years since publication100200300

Peers

Cong Ye
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Ophthalmology 224
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 340
  • Epidemiology 155
  • Statistics and Probability 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 203
Replace Helen Baker with:
Helen Baker United Kingdom
Kazım Özdamar Türkiye
M. Granger Morgan United States
Yfke Ongena Netherlands
Leilei Zeng Canada
Judy Birdsell Canada
Yuta Tanoue Japan
Bobbie Macdonald United States
Farzana Rahman Bangladesh
Margaret Lloyd Australia
Cong Ye relative to Helen Baker United Kingdom Helen Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Helen Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Ye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Ye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Ye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Ye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Ye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Ye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Ye. The network helps show where Cong Ye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Ye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Ye Line = papers co-authored together Cong Ye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys
Hit paper breakdown →
2012354
2 201587
3 202167
4 201362
5 202145
6 201542
7 201337
8 202136
9 201535
10 201830
11 201924
12 201622
13 201920
14 202218
15 201415
16 202014
17 201413
18 202210
19 201510
20 202010

About Cong Ye

Cong Ye is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (224 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (340 citations), Epidemiology (155 citations), Statistics and Probability (40 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (203 citations). Cong Ye has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eleanor Singer, Vishal Jhanji, Christopher Kai-Shun Leung, Marco Yu, Robert N. Weinreb, Zheng Wang, Victor C.P. Woo, Tommy C.Y. Chan, George P. M. Cheng and Alex L. K. Ng. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic Research, American Journal of Ophthalmology and BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact