Cong Ye

804 citations
35 papers · 626 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Ye

30 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Cong Ye
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Ophthalmology 242
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 305
  • Epidemiology 126
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 12
  • Pharmaceutical Science 5
Replace Pinghui Wei with:
Pinghui Wei China
Leyla Asena Türkiye
Nicolás Alejandre‐Alba Spain
Naoya Yoshihara Japan
Francisco L. Lugo Spain
Li‐Lian Foo Singapore
Mohammad Miraftab Iran
Ellen Redenbo United States
George A. Kounis Greece
Lan‐Hsin Chuang Taiwan
Cong Ye relative to Pinghui Wei China Pinghui Wei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Pinghui Wei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Ye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Ye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Ye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Ye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Ye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Ye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Ye. The network helps show where Cong Ye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Ye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Ye Line = papers co-authored together Cong Ye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201586
2 202177
3 201362
4 201543
5 202143
6 201337
7 201537
8 201833
9 201926
10 201622
11 202219
12 201416
13 202016
14 201414
15 202011
16 202211
17 201510
18 202010
19 20209
20 20238

About Cong Ye

Cong Ye is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (1 paper) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (242 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (305 citations), Epidemiology (126 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (12 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (5 citations). Cong Ye has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Vishal Jhanji, Christopher Kai-Shun Leung, Robert Neal Weinreb, Marco Yu, Zheng Wang, George P. M. Cheng, Alex L. K. Ng, Victor C.P. Woo, Tommy C.Y. Chan and Xiangtian Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic Research, BMC Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact