Cong Wei

21 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Cong Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Decision Sciences 9
  • Communication 30
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
  • Human-Computer Interaction 23
Replace Kristen Duke with:
Kristen Duke United States
Jordan Carpenter United States
Julie A. Woodzicka United States
Jason Proulx Canada
Tim Wulf Germany
Robin M. Akert United States
Rosa Mikeal Martey United States
Marion Händel Germany
David Chan Hong Kong
Martin Hänze Germany
Cong Wei relative to Kristen Duke United States Kristen Duke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Kristen Duke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Wei. The network helps show where Cong Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Wei Line = papers co-authored together Cong Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017204
2 200531
3 200530
4 202121
5 202018
6 201815
7 202112
8 20229
9 20197
10 20156
11 20055
12 20225
13 20214
14 20054
15 20233
16 20223
17 20183
18 20222
19 20051
20 20231

About Cong Wei

Cong Wei is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 22 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers) and Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Communication (30 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (23 citations). Cong Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Xiaomin Sun, Gang Xue, Jia Liu, Chunfang Zhou, Beth Kolko, Jianning Dang, Liu Li, Jan H. Spyridakis, Brandon S. Maust and Lei Cao. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, International Journal of Psychology, Social Psychological and Personality Science and Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact