Cong Fu

818 citations
49 papers · 554 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 4
    • Extracellular vesicles in disease 3
    • Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas 4

Cong Fu

43 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Cong Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Genetics 97
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 41
  • Cancer Research 75
  • Molecular Biology 240
  • Neurology 27
Replace Barbara Leutgeb with:
Barbara Leutgeb Germany
Florian Alonso Switzerland
Giulia Ruozi Italy
Ryan G. Walker United States
Jimmy Stalin France
Fengzhi Ding China
Craig Bolte United States
Beatriz Sánchez‐Solana United States
Qing-jun Zhang China
Federica Riu United Kingdom
Cong Fu relative to Barbara Leutgeb Germany Barbara Leutgeb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Barbara Leutgeb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Fu. The network helps show where Cong Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Fu Line = papers co-authored together Cong Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201255
2 201539
3 201434
4 201628
5 201528
6 202226
7 201223
8 201523
9 201320
10 201720
11 200718
12 201817
13 201716
14 202215
15 202014
16 201414
17 202014
18 202112
19 202312
20 202211

About Cong Fu

Cong Fu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, Immunology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (5 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (4 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (4 papers), Immune cells in cancer (3 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers) and Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (97 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (41 citations), Cancer Research (75 citations), Molecular Biology (240 citations) and Neurology (27 citations). Cong Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Yuyu Yao, Yuhan Cao, Wenbin Lu, Genshan Ma, Ran Huo, Steven L. Coon, David C. Klein, Yong Tang, Julie Chao and Chengxing Shen. Their work appears in journals such as Disease Markers, Annals of Medicine, Clinical and investigative medicine, PLoS ONE and Renal Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact