Cong Cao

2.8k citations
78 papers · 1.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Cao

73 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Cong Cao
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 281
  • Economics and Econometrics 683
  • Strategy and Management 373
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 157
  • Business and International Management 43
Replace Carter Walter Bloch with:
Carter Walter Bloch Denmark
Benoı̂t Godin Canada
Ingo Liefner Germany
Torben Schubert Germany
Aurora A.C. Teixeira Portugal
Philippe Larédo France
Li Tang China
Michael M. Crow United States
Anne L. J. Ter Wal United Kingdom
John McHale United States
Cong Cao relative to Carter Walter Bloch Denmark Carter Walter Bloch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Carter Walter Bloch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Cao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Cao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Cao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Cao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Cao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Cao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Cao. The network helps show where Cong Cao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Cao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Cao Line = papers co-authored together Cong Cao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011246
2 2006103
3 200891
4 201975
5 201866
6 201862
7 201560
8 201660
9 201359
10 201559
11 201654
12 200452
13 202046
14 201446
15 200945
16 200645
17 202139
18 201439
19 200435
20 200435

About Cong Cao

Cong Cao is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (13 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (10 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (5 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (4 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (281 citations), Economics and Econometrics (683 citations), Strategy and Management (373 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (157 citations) and Business and International Management (43 citations). Cong Cao has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denis Fred Simon, Yutao Sun, Richard P. Suttmeier, Liu Feng-chao, Ning Li, Bo Zhang, Richard P. Appelbaum, Koen Jonkers, Caroline S. Wagner and Jeroen Baas. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Nature, Scientometrics, Minerva and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact