Concetta D’Arrigo

1.2k citations
15 papers · 847 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Concetta D’Arrigo

15 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

Concetta D’Arrigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
  • Pharmacology 99
  • Pharmacology 140
  • Clinical Psychology 145
Replace Vincenza Santoro with:
Vincenza Santoro Italy
Bruno Pfuhlmann Germany
Judith C. Kando United States
Stefan Unterecker Germany
Michael Paulzen Germany
Herbert Pfeiffer Germany
I. Gaertner Germany
Gary M. Levin United States
C. Barnas Austria
Gabriel Eckermann Germany
Concetta D’Arrigo relative to Vincenza Santoro Italy Vincenza Santoro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vincenza Santoro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Concetta D’Arrigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Concetta D’Arrigo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concetta D’Arrigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concetta D’Arrigo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Concetta D’Arrigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Concetta D’Arrigo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Concetta D’Arrigo. The network helps show where Concetta D’Arrigo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Concetta D’Arrigo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Concetta D’Arrigo Line = papers co-authored together Concetta D’Arrigo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008263
2 200394
3 201277
4 200473
5 201261
6 200349
7 200643
8 200936
9 200935
10 201130
11 200629
12 200418
13 200715
14 200514
15 200810

About Concetta D’Arrigo

Concetta D’Arrigo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (366 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations), Pharmacology (99 citations), Pharmacology (140 citations) and Clinical Psychology (145 citations). Concetta D’Arrigo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Edoardo Spina, Vincenza Santoro, Maria Gabriella Scordo, Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello, José de León, Rocco Antonio Zoccali, Gianluca Pandolfo, Umberto Micò, Antonella Gagliano and Eva Germanò. Their work appears in journals such as Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Neuropharmacology, Pharmacological Research and International Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact