Concetta D’Arrigo

15 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Concetta D’Arrigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 403
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Pharmacology 109
  • Pharmacology 152
  • Clinical Psychology 161
Replace Vincenza Santoro with:
Vincenza Santoro Italy
Bruno Pfuhlmann Germany
Neil B. Sandson United States
Judith C. Kando United States
Michael Paulzen Germany
Stefan Unterecker Germany
Gary M. Levin United States
I. Gaertner Germany
Stanley W. Carson United States
Gabriel Eckermann Germany
Concetta D’Arrigo relative to Vincenza Santoro Italy Vincenza Santoro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vincenza Santoro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Concetta D’Arrigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Concetta D’Arrigo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concetta D’Arrigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concetta D’Arrigo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Concetta D’Arrigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Concetta D’Arrigo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Concetta D’Arrigo. The network helps show where Concetta D’Arrigo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Concetta D’Arrigo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Concetta D’Arrigo Line = papers co-authored together Concetta D’Arrigo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008284
2 2003101
3 200481
4 201280
5 201262
6 200353
7 200643
8 200939
9 200636
10 200935
11 201132
12 200421
13 200718
14 200514
15 200810

About Concetta D’Arrigo

Concetta D’Arrigo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (403 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Pharmacology (109 citations), Pharmacology (152 citations) and Clinical Psychology (161 citations). Concetta D’Arrigo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Edoardo Spina, Vincenza Santoro, Maria Gabriella Scordo, Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello, Rocco Antonio Zoccali, José de León, Gianluca Pandolfo, Umberto Micò, Eva Germanò and Antonella Gagliano. Their work appears in journals such as Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Clinical Therapeutics and Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact