Côme Bureau

24 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers

Côme Bureau
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 60
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 96
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 14
  • Transplantation 6
  • Nephrology 13
Replace Valeria Raggi with:
Valeria Raggi Italy
Jean Reignier France
A. Medina Villanueva Spain
Lisanne H. Roesthuis Netherlands
Dimitros Matamis Greece
Alessandro Ghiani Germany
J. A. Cambronero Spain
Haikel Oueslati France
Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto Mexico
José Colleti Brazil
Côme Bureau relative to Valeria Raggi Italy Valeria Raggi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Valeria Raggi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Côme Bureau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Côme Bureau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Côme Bureau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Côme Bureau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Côme Bureau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Côme Bureau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Côme Bureau. The network helps show where Côme Bureau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Côme Bureau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Côme Bureau Line = papers co-authored together Côme Bureau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201732
2 202330
3 202322
4 202115
5 202311
6 202210
7 20227
8 20237
9 20226
10 20235
11 20215
12 20245
13 20224
14 20234
15 20243
16 20213
17 20193
18 20202
19 20202
20 20242

About Côme Bureau

Côme Bureau is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nephrology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Organ Donation and Transplantation (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (60 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (96 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (14 citations), Transplantation (6 citations) and Nephrology (13 citations). Côme Bureau has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Martin Dres, Thomas Similowski, Alexandre Demoule, Marine Van Hollebeke, Élise Morawiec, Maxens Decavèle, Julien Mayaux, Marie‐Cécile Nierat, Camille Rolland‐Debord and Isabelle Rivals. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Intensive Care, Anesthesiology, Scientific Reports, European Respiratory Review and European Respiratory Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact