Colin Wright

417 citations
15 papers · 220 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Wright

14 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Colin Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Internal Medicine 71
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 45
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
  • Statistics and Probability 25
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 45
Replace C.C. van Schaik with:
C.C. van Schaik Netherlands
Renata Rojas Guerra Brazil
Kathryn M. O’Callaghan United States
Yige Li China
Cristina Sotto Belgium
Özlem İlk Türkiye
Manisha Joshi India
Aditi Khandelwal Canada
Ondřej Vencálek Czechia
Elham Bayat Mokhtari United States
Colin Wright relative to C.C. van Schaik Netherlands C.C. van Schaik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
C.C. van Schaik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Wright. The network helps show where Colin Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colin Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Wright Line = papers co-authored together Colin Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202144
2 201541
3 200137
4 200229
5 201822
6 201411
7 200310
8 20217
9 20094
10 19984
11 20214
12
Emotional Impact of Amblyopia Treatment on Preschool Children
20014
13 20192
14 20181
15 20190

About Colin Wright

Colin Wright is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Control and Systems Engineering and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Q Methodology Applications (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (2 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (71 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (45 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations), Statistics and Probability (25 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (45 citations). Colin Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Y. Hu, David E. Booth, Andreas P. Modlmeier, Jonathan N. Pruitt, Carl N. Keiser, James L. L. Lichtenstein, Scott J. Cameron, Ayman Elbadawi, Yu Lin Chen and Ilan Goldenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Omega, The American Journal of Cardiology, Current Opinion in Insect Science and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact