Colin Imber

21 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Colin Imber
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 222
  • Anthropology 86
  • Classics 27
  • History 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
Replace Norman Itzkowitz with:
Norman Itzkowitz United States
Aziz Al–Azmeh Austria
Linda T. Darling United States
Justin McCarthy United States
Ronald C. Jennings United States
Haim Gerber Israel
R. A. Abou-El-Haj United States
Carter Vaughn Findley United States
Thomas Max Safley United States
Norman Daniel Canada
Colin Imber relative to Norman Itzkowitz United States Norman Itzkowitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Norman Itzkowitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Imber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Imber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Imber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Imber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Imber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Imber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Imber. The network helps show where Colin Imber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colin Imber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Imber Line = papers co-authored together Colin Imber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975103
2 197498
3 199944
4 199732
5 199717
6 201014
7
Studies in Ottoman history in honour of professor V.L. Ménage
199410
8
The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power
201910
9 19879
10
The balance of truth : essays in honour of Professor Geoffrey Lewis
20008
11 20098
12 20126
13 20005
14
Warfare, Law And Pseudo-History
20113
15 19942
16 19932
17 19762
18 20022
19
"An Illiberal Descent": Kemalism and Ottoman Law
20051
20 20001

About Colin Imber

Colin Imber is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Archeology and Social Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (16 papers), Ottoman Empire History and Society (7 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (6 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (5 papers), Ottoman and Turkish Studies (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Turkey's Politics and Society (3 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (222 citations), Anthropology (86 citations), Classics (27 citations), History (47 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (177 citations). Colin Imber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Halil İnalcık, Norman Itzkowitz, Peter Charanis, A. O. Sarkissian, Gregory Kozlowski, Colin Heywood, Geoffrey Lewis, Suraiya Faroqhi, Gilles Veinstein and Leslie Peirce. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Metascience, Law and History Review, The Classical World and Archaeometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact