Colin Darch

436 citations
38 papers · 246 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Darch

32 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Colin Darch
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Library and Information Sciences 35
  • Public Administration 21
  • Anthropology 39
  • Political Science and International Relations 80
  • Law 26
Replace Jean Slemmons Stratford with:
Jean Slemmons Stratford United States
Bruce Morton United States
Vivienne Monty Canada
Sergiu Mișcoiu Romania
Sarah Brierley United States
Jonathan N. C. Hill United Kingdom
Barrie Axford United Kingdom
Brian Palmer‐Rubin United States
C. R. Hensman
Martin K. Dimitrov United States
Colin Darch relative to Jean Slemmons Stratford United States Jean Slemmons Stratford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Jean Slemmons Stratford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Darch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Darch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Darch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Darch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Darch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Darch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Darch. The network helps show where Colin Darch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Colin Darch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Darch Line = papers co-authored together Colin Darch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201041
2 200520
3 201018
4 200517
5 199916
6 198316
7 201415
8
The copy/south dossier : issues in the economics, politics, and ideology of copyright in the global south
200615
9 198311
10 19998
11 19897
12 20156
13 20126
14 20136
15 20145
16 20105
17
Political rhetoric in the transition to Mozambican independence: Samora Machel in Beira, June 1975
20134
18 20134
19 19753
20 20143

About Colin Darch

Colin Darch is a scholar working on Anthropology, Library and Information Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 38 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (11 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (5 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (5 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (4 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (3 papers) and Library Science and Administration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (35 citations), Public Administration (21 citations), Anthropology (39 citations), Political Science and International Relations (80 citations) and Law (26 citations). Colin Darch has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Mozambique and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Peter Graham Underwood, Karin de Jager and WILLIAM L. DANIELS. Their work appears in journals such as Review of African Political Economy, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Istoriya, Performance Measurement and Metrics and Economy and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact