C.O. Kim

26 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

C.O. Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 98
  • Mechanical Engineering 113
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 85
  • Biomaterials 33
  • Materials Chemistry 112
Replace Е. П. Найден with:
Е. П. Найден Russia
М. А. Gorbunova Russia
Xiaojie Yang China
Yundan Yu China
Hoang Tri Hai Japan
Hidetoshi Takiishi Brazil
Yewen Xu China
Nan Tang United States
Weijie Lin China
C.O. Kim relative to Е. П. Найден Russia Е. П. Найден's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Е. П. Найден · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.O. Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.O. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.O. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.O. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.O. Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.O. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.O. Kim. The network helps show where C.O. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.O. Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.O. Kim Line = papers co-authored together C.O. Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200681
2 200741
3 200633
4 200023
5 200416
6 200714
7 200614
8 200611
9 20039
10 20029
11 20079
12 20028
13 20047
14 19997
15 20066
16 20066
17 20036
18 20026
19 20075
20 20064

About C.O. Kim

C.O. Kim is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (16 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (11 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (7 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers), Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (98 citations), Mechanical Engineering (113 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (85 citations), Biomaterials (33 citations) and Materials Chemistry (112 citations). C.O. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include Henry Shu-Hung Chung, Hoang Tri Hai, Jaeryeong Lee, Ji-Ho Lim, Jong Gwan Ahn, C.G. Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Jong-Gwan Ahn, N. A. Buznikov and Hyeongseok Yun. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Surface and Coatings Technology, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Current Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact