Clive Wells
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 28
- Oncology 24
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 9
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 4
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 4
- Co-authors
- Ghada Elayat (11 shared papers)R Carpenter (23 shared papers)Jeremy Jones (1 shared paper)Sarah J. Payne (1 shared paper)Ian O. Ellis (4 shared papers)H.D. Zakhour (2 shared papers)Simonetta Bianchi (3 shared papers)Naveena Singh (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of Surgical Oncology (10 papers)Journal of Clinical Pathology (8 papers)Histopathology (6 papers)Clinical Radiology (4 papers)Cytopathology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Clive Wells
67 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cancer Research 608
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 663
- Dermatology 276
- Oncology 446
- Immunology and Allergy 59
Countries citing papers authored by Clive Wells
This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Wells. The network helps show where Clive Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 166 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 99 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 49 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 38 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 20 | One-stop diagnosis for symptomatic breast disease. | 1995 | 32 |
About Clive Wells
Clive Wells is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Dermatology and Surgery, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (28 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (20 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (16 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers), AI in cancer detection (7 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (4 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (608 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (663 citations), Dermatology (276 citations), Oncology (446 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (59 citations). Clive Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ghada Elayat, R Carpenter, Jeremy Jones, Sarah J. Payne, Ian O. Ellis, H.D. Zakhour, Simonetta Bianchi, Naveena Singh, Gerald Gui and Thomas Decker. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Histopathology, Clinical Radiology and Cytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.