Clive Matthews

669 citations
10 papers · 77 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 3
    • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 2
    • Linguistic Education and Pedagogy 1
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 3
    • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning 1

Clive Matthews

10 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

Clive Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Language and Linguistics 31
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 32
  • Computer Science Applications 10
  • Linguistics and Language 7
  • Artificial Intelligence 37
Replace Mark Newson with:
Mark Newson Hungary
Pieter de Haan Netherlands
Herman Wekker Netherlands
Krista Varantola Finland
Olga Lyashevskaya Russia
Pietro Trifone
Bronwen Patricia Dyson Australia
Marie-Odile Junker Canada
Christian Soto Chile
Martin Walkow United States
Clive Matthews relative to Mark Newson Hungary Mark Newson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark Newson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Matthews. The network helps show where Clive Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Clive Matthews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive Matthews Line = papers co-authored together Clive Matthews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 199331
2 200910
3
Intelligent computer assisted language learning as cognitive science: the choice of syntactic frameworks for language tutoring
19948
4
New perspectives in modern language learning
19927
5 19927
6 19995
7 19943
8 20053
9 20132
10 20161

About Clive Matthews

Clive Matthews is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 10 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (1 paper), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), Open Education and E-Learning (1 paper) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (31 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (32 citations), Computer Science Applications (10 citations), Linguistics and Language (7 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (37 citations). Clive Matthews has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Fox and John Schostak. Their work appears in journals such as Lingua, Computers & Education, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, Second language Research and CALICO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact