Clive Fox

2.6k citations
67 papers · 1.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Clive Fox

66 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Clive Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 667
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Aquatic Science 312
  • Ecology 852
  • Oceanography 295
Replace Pedro Afonso with:
Pedro Afonso Portugal
Christopher T. Taggart Canada
Ignacio A. Catalán Spain
Richard S. Nemeth United States
Anna B. Neuheimer United States
Juan M. Dı́az de Astarloa Argentina
Steven L. H. Teo United States
João P. Barreiros Portugal
Michael J. W. Stokesbury Canada
Diego R. Barneche Australia
Clive Fox relative to Pedro Afonso Portugal Pedro Afonso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pedro Afonso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Fox. The network helps show where Clive Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive Fox Line = papers co-authored together Clive Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019167
2 200285
3 201782
4 200870
5 201469
6 200067
7 200565
8
A literature review of studies on fish egg mortality: implications for the estimation of spawning stock biomass by the annual egg production method
200063
9 200360
10 200658
11 199455
12 199651
13 200751
14 200050
15 200947
16 200847
17 202142
18 199940
19 201738
20 199337

About Clive Fox

Clive Fox is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Aquatic Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (50 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (27 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (18 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (10 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (9 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (6 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (667 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Aquatic Science (312 citations), Ecology (852 citations) and Oceanography (295 citations). Clive Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Martin I. Taylor, Ciro Rico, Richard D.M. Nash, Johanna J. Heymans, Audrey J. Geffen, Mark Dickey‐Collas, Benjamin Planque, Natalia Serpetti, Chris Darby and Jacob W. Bentley. Their work appears in journals such as ICES Journal of Marine Science, Journal of Sea Research, Journal of Fish Biology, Fisheries Oceanography and Frontiers in Marine Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact