Clemente Lauretti

26 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Clemente Lauretti
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Rehabilitation 136
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
  • Biomedical Engineering 272
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111
  • Control and Systems Engineering 128
Replace Craig G. McDonald with:
Craig G. McDonald United States
Ahmetcan Erdoğan Türkiye
Kuankuan Zhao China
Marco Caimmi Italy
Tatsuya Teramae Japan
Dylan P. Losey United States
D. S. V. Bandara Japan
Matteo Malosio Italy
Maged S. Al-Quraishi Malaysia
Muhammad Ahsan Gull Denmark
Clemente Lauretti relative to Craig G. McDonald United States Craig G. McDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Craig G. McDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clemente Lauretti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clemente Lauretti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemente Lauretti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemente Lauretti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clemente Lauretti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemente Lauretti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemente Lauretti. The network helps show where Clemente Lauretti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clemente Lauretti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clemente Lauretti Line = papers co-authored together Clemente Lauretti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 201848
3 202045
4 201932
5 202324
6 202122
7 202222
8 202020
9 202118
10 201918
11 201618
12 201718
13 201713
14 202311
15 202311
16 202211
17 20237
18 20245
19 20234
20 20234

About Clemente Lauretti

Clemente Lauretti is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Control and Systems Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (8 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (136 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Biomedical Engineering (272 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (128 citations). Clemente Lauretti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Loredana Zollo, Francesca Cordella, Eugenio Guglielmelli, Christian Tamantini, Silvia Sterzi, Cosimo Gentile, José Catalán, Simona Crea, Angelo Davalli and Nicolás García-Aracil. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, IEEE Access, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, International Journal of Social Robotics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact