Clemente Cesarano

3.0k citations
194 papers · 2.3k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Clemente Cesarano

185 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Clemente Cesarano
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Modeling and Simulation 857
  • Numerical Analysis 702
  • Applied Mathematics 1.1k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 458
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 821
Replace Gradimir V. Milovanović with:
Gradimir V. Milovanović Serbia
Alexander Ivanovich Aptekarev Russia
Junesang Choi South Korea
R. Wong Hong Kong
D. S. Lubinsky United States
Mohammad Masjed‐Jamei Iran
Sergei Rogosin Belarus
Andrei Martı́nez-Finkelshtein Spain
A. Ronveaux Belgium
Francisco Marcellán Spain
Clemente Cesarano relative to Gradimir V. Milovanović Serbia Gradimir V. Milovanović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gradimir V. Milovanović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clemente Cesarano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clemente Cesarano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemente Cesarano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemente Cesarano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clemente Cesarano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemente Cesarano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemente Cesarano. The network helps show where Clemente Cesarano may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clemente Cesarano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clemente Cesarano Line = papers co-authored together Clemente Cesarano links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 194 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020101
2 200262
3 201960
4 200452
5 202250
6 202250
7 200145
8 199642
9 201242
10 200339
11 202038
12 201937
13 201937
14 202236
15 202136
16 202235
17 202034
18 202233
19 201533
20 201932

About Clemente Cesarano

Clemente Cesarano is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis, Modeling and Simulation and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 194 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (60 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (60 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (45 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (39 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (39 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (37 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (21 papers) and Numerical methods for differential equations (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (857 citations), Numerical Analysis (702 citations), Applied Mathematics (1.1k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (458 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (821 citations). Clemente Cesarano has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Wael W. Mohammed, G. Dattoli, Farah M. Al‐Askar, Paolo Emilio Ricci, Omar Bazighifan, Hijaz Ahmad, Osama Moaaz, S. Lorenzutta, William Ramírez and Yu‐Ming Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Symmetry, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Computation and AIMS Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact