Clément Gallay

581 citations
12 papers · 355 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections 7
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 5
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1

Clément Gallay

11 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Clément Gallay
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Molecular Medicine 43
  • Microbiology 33
  • Endocrinology 22
  • Genetics 117
  • Infectious Diseases 69
Replace Asan Turdiev with:
Asan Turdiev United States
Won-Sik Yeo United States
Aleš Ulrych Czechia
Vincent de Bakker Switzerland
Marcel Prax Germany
Michael J. Boersma United States
Betty Fleuchot France
Céline Freton France
Merve S. Zeden Ireland
Amilcar J. Perez United States
Clément Gallay relative to Asan Turdiev United States Asan Turdiev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Asan Turdiev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clément Gallay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clément Gallay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clément Gallay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clément Gallay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clément Gallay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clément Gallay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clément Gallay. The network helps show where Clément Gallay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clément Gallay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clément Gallay Line = papers co-authored together Clément Gallay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2017201
2 201933
3 202132
4 201924
5 202021
6 201514
7 201912
8 202411
9 20235
10 20251
11 20241
12 20240

About Clément Gallay

Clément Gallay is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Oncology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (7 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (43 citations), Microbiology (33 citations), Endocrinology (22 citations), Genetics (117 citations) and Infectious Diseases (69 citations). Clément Gallay has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jan‐Willem Veening, Robin A. Sorg, Morten Kjos, Arnau Domenech, Kèvin Knoops, Jelle Slager, Sebastiaan P. van Kessel, Jing‐Ren Zhang, Xue Liu and Dorte Frees. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Microbiology, Nature Microbiology, PLoS Pathogens, Scientific Reports and Communications Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact