Clea Kolster

422 citations
9 papers · 303 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Clea Kolster

8 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Clea Kolster
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Environmental Engineering 144
  • Catalysis 42
  • Mechanical Engineering 198
  • Ocean Engineering 59
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 10
Replace Mike Haines with:
Mike Haines United Kingdom
Mohammed Al-Juaied United States
Ahmed Shafeen Canada
Jaeheum Jung South Korea
Masaki Iijima Japan
Pil Rip Jeon South Korea
Shisen Xu China
Hesam Ostovari Germany
Natalie Nakaten Germany
Sumie Nakayama Japan
Clea Kolster relative to Mike Haines United Kingdom Mike Haines's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Mike Haines · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clea Kolster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clea Kolster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clea Kolster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clea Kolster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clea Kolster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clea Kolster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clea Kolster. The network helps show where Clea Kolster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Clea Kolster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clea Kolster Line = papers co-authored together Clea Kolster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201782
2 201781
3 201679
4 201720
5 201717
6 201711
7 20199
8
Cost and performance of some carbon capture technology options for producing different quality CO2 product streams
20164
9 20210

About Clea Kolster

Clea Kolster is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (4 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (2 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (2 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (1 paper), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (1 paper), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper) and Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (144 citations), Catalysis (42 citations), Mechanical Engineering (198 citations), Ocean Engineering (59 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (10 citations). Clea Kolster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Niall Mac Dowell, Samuel Krevor, Evgenia Mechleri, Mohammad S. Masnadi, Adam R. Brandt, Michael Fairweather, Richard Porter, Nilay Shah, Robert Woolley and Niall MacDowell. Their work appears in journals such as International journal of greenhouse gas control, Energy & Environmental Science, The Electricity Journal, White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) and Energy Procedia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact