Clayton DeVault

2.6k citations
39 papers · 2.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Clayton DeVault

39 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Clayton DeVault
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.3k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 600
  • Biomedical Engineering 625
  • Materials Chemistry 241
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 1
Replace M. Zahirul Alam with:
M. Zahirul Alam Canada
Domenico de Ceglia Italy
Saman Jahani United States
Soham Saha United States
Osamu Takayama Denmark
Ivan Sinev Russia
Sergey Lepeshov Russia
Haroldo Takashi Hattori Australia
Salvatore Campione United States
Luca Carletti Italy
Clayton DeVault relative to M. Zahirul Alam Canada M. Zahirul Alam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Zahirul Alam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clayton DeVault

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clayton DeVault's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clayton DeVault with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clayton DeVault more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clayton DeVault

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clayton DeVault. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clayton DeVault. The network helps show where Clayton DeVault may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clayton DeVault, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clayton DeVault Line = papers co-authored together Clayton DeVault links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015310
2 2019306
3 2018144
4 2018127
5 2016120
6 2016112
7 2017103
8 202198
9 202096
10 202092
11 201671
12 201759
13 202158
14 201550
15 201849
16 202049
17 202436
18 201833
19 202131
20 201629

About Clayton DeVault

Clayton DeVault is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (22 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (8 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (7 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (7 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (6 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers), ZnO doping and properties (3 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (600 citations), Biomedical Engineering (625 citations), Materials Chemistry (241 citations) and Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 citation). Clayton DeVault has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra E. Boltasseva, Vladimir M. Shalaev, Nathaniel Kinsey, Marcello Ferrera, Daniele Faccio, Alexander V. Kildishev, Jiwon Lai Kim, Matteo Clerici, Vincenzo Bruno and Di Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Materials Express, Nano Letters, Nature Communications, Optica and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact