Claudius Böhm

484 citations
7 papers · 412 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
    • Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
    • Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
    • Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

Papers in

    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 5
    • Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 4
    • Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods 3
    • Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies 1

Claudius Böhm

7 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Claudius Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Organic Chemistry 354
  • Cancer Research 22
  • Toxicology 4
  • Molecular Biology 39
  • Inorganic Chemistry 9
Replace Kimberly S. Petersen with:
Kimberly S. Petersen United States
S. SHARMA India
Guillaume Magueur France
Fabienne Grellepois France
Mouhamad Jida France
Philip G. Wainwright United Kingdom
Harsh Mohan Gauniyal India
Adina Ryckebusch France
Wai‐Lun Lam Hong Kong
David S. Barnett United States
Claudius Böhm relative to Kimberly S. Petersen United States Kimberly S. Petersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kimberly S. Petersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claudius Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudius Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudius Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudius Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudius Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudius Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudius Böhm. The network helps show where Claudius Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Claudius Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claudius Böhm Line = papers co-authored together Claudius Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Claudius Böhm

Claudius Böhm is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 7 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (1 paper), Pregnancy-related medical research (1 paper), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (1 paper) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (354 citations), Cancer Research (22 citations), Toxicology (4 citations), Molecular Biology (39 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (9 citations). Claudius Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Reiser, Michael Seitz, Rakeshwar B. Chhor, Bernd Nosse, Sebastian Sörgel, Manfred Zabel, Christian Bubert, Emilio Parisini, Thomas Labahn and Dirk H. Trauner. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Letters, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, Chemistry - A European Journal, European Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact