Clare Hocking

2.8k citations
130 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Clare Hocking

127 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Clare Hocking
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Occupational Therapy 1.1k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 105
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 492
  • Rehabilitation 166
  • Clinical Psychology 321
Replace Gail Whiteford with:
Gail Whiteford Australia
Ann A. Wilcock Australia
Virginia Dickie United States
Karen Whalley Hammell Canada
Elizabeth J. Yerxa United States
Ruth Zemke United States
Matthew Molineux Australia
Karen Stagnitti Australia
Melinda Suto Canada
Kirsty Forsyth United Kingdom
Clare Hocking relative to Gail Whiteford Australia Gail Whiteford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gail Whiteford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Hocking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Hocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Hocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Hocking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Hocking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Hocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Hocking. The network helps show where Clare Hocking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clare Hocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clare Hocking Line = papers co-authored together Clare Hocking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017126
2 2009118
3 2000106
4 199996
5 200084
6 201273
7 200967
8 201064
9 200259
10 200255
11
Occupational Science: Society, Inclusion, Participation
201155
12 200349
13 201247
14 201039
15 200039
16 201136
17 200134
18 200427
19 201526
20 201225

About Clare Hocking

Clare Hocking is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (73 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (26 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Research in Social Sciences (4 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (1.1k citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (105 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (492 citations), Rehabilitation (166 citations) and Clinical Psychology (321 citations). Clare Hocking has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Smythe, Gail Whiteford, Valerie Wright‐St Clair, Daniel Sutton, Kirk Reed, Elizabeth Townsend, Jan Piggot, Janis Paterson, Stewart Einfeld and Reinie Cordier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational Science, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Disability and Rehabilitation and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact