Christopher Webb

954 citations
28 papers · 560 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Webb

28 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Christopher Webb
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 53
  • Surgery 410
  • Emergency Medicine 62
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
  • Neurology 81
Replace Mark N. Pernik with:
Mark N. Pernik United States
Vincent C. Traynelis United States
Paul Soeding Australia
C. Schinkel Germany
Anthony C. Chin United States
Pierpaolo Giomarelli Italy
Aurel C. Cernaianu United States
Warren M. Breisblatt United States
Davis G. Taylor United States
Takayuki Yoshida Japan
Christopher Webb relative to Mark N. Pernik United States Mark N. Pernik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Mark N. Pernik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Webb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Webb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Webb. The network helps show where Christopher Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Webb Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Webb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012103
2 201279
3 201642
4 201941
5 202235
6 201331
7 200831
8 201626
9 200825
10 201622
11 201322
12 201418
13 201717
14 201414
15 201911
16 20146
17 20176
18 20186
19 20214
20 20134

About Christopher Webb

Christopher Webb is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (11 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (53 citations), Surgery (410 citations), Emergency Medicine (62 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations) and Neurology (81 citations). Christopher Webb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul D. Weyker, Brigid C. Flynn, Richard A. Prayson, Peter P. Fu, Susan J. Stanley, Timothy Tang, Richard M. Smiley, Pamela Flood, Li Zhang and Richard K. Raker. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Anesthesiology Clinics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact