Christopher Torr

11 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Christopher Torr
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Psychology 7
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29
  • History 28
Replace Ernest Campbell Mossner with:
Ernest Campbell Mossner United Kingdom
George Lichtheim
Maximilien Rubel Israel
Ian Simpson Ross Canada
William B. Scott Canada
Robert D. Schulzinger United States
Roland N. Stromberg United States
Alexander De Grand United States
Joel Isaac United Kingdom
David Eastwood United Kingdom
Christopher Torr relative to Ernest Campbell Mossner United Kingdom Ernest Campbell Mossner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ernest Campbell Mossner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Torr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Torr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Torr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Torr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Torr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Torr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Torr. The network helps show where Christopher Torr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Torr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Torr Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Torr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2000159
2 200013
3 19848
4 19855
5 19815
6 19804
7 19924
8 20192
9 19802
10 19802
11 19842
12 19811
13 19780
14
Equilibrium, expectations and information : a study of the general theory, the neo-classical synthesis and modern classical macroeconomics
19840
15 20010
16
Equilibrium, Expectations and Information: A Study of the General Theory and Modern Classical Economics
20190
17 19850

About Christopher Torr

Christopher Torr is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Strategy and Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (7 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (6 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (1 paper), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper) and Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (7 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (29 citations) and History (28 citations). Christopher Torr has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Roger Koppl, Stephan Boehm, Israel M. Kirzner, Peter Lewin, Don Lavoie, Colin Rogers and Jochen Runde. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Political Economy, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, The Economic Journal, South African Journal of Economics and South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact