Christopher Scott Bailey

31 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Christopher Scott Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Equine 98
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 151
  • Small Animals 79
  • Reproductive Medicine 28
  • Microbiology 17
Replace Natali Krekeler with:
Natali Krekeler Australia
Bruna da Rosa Curcio Brazil
Karen E. Wolfsdorf United States
Harutaka MURASE Japan
Sara K. Lyle United States
Ryan A. Ferris United States
Pedro Paulo Maia Teixeira Brazil
Gurkamal Dhaliwal Malaysia
W. Thomas Riddle United States
John P. Hurtgen United States
Christopher Scott Bailey relative to Natali Krekeler Australia Natali Krekeler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natali Krekeler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Scott Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Scott Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Scott Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Scott Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Scott Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Scott Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Scott Bailey. The network helps show where Christopher Scott Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Scott Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Scott Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Scott Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201064
2 201437
3 201129
4 200826
5 201223
6 201321
7 201119
8 201213
9 201112
10 200710
11 202010
12 20139
13 20197
14 20146
15 20185
16 20085
17 20205
18 20204
19 20144
20 20194

About Christopher Scott Bailey

Christopher Scott Bailey is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Equine, Small Animals, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 35 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (16 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (7 papers), Animal health and immunology (5 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (98 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (151 citations), Small Animals (79 citations), Reproductive Medicine (28 citations) and Microbiology (17 citations). Christopher Scott Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Margo L. Macpherson, Małgorzata A. Pozor, Mats H.T. Troedsson, Thomas W. Vickroy, Michelle M. LeBlanc, Shelly L. Vaden, Megan E. Jacob, Michael W. Wood, Steeve Giguère and L. Chris Sanchez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Theriogenology, The Spine Journal, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine and Equine Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact