Christopher Scott

2.1k citations
69 papers · 1.6k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Scott

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Christopher Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Reproductive Medicine 828
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 313
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 153
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 185
  • Biochemistry 96
Replace James S. Kinsey‐Jones with:
James S. Kinsey‐Jones United Kingdom
Muhammad Shahab Pakistan
Maciej Sassek Poland
Juan L. Hancke Chile
L. Nogowski Poland
Flaminia Fanelli Italy
David B. West United States
Haolin Zhang China
Manabu Tanabe Japan
Laszlo Hackler United States
Christopher Scott relative to James S. Kinsey‐Jones United Kingdom James S. Kinsey‐Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
James S. Kinsey‐Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Scott. The network helps show where Christopher Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Scott Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199593
2 200083
3 201869
4 201768
5 200460
6 201855
7 199753
8 199350
9 200047
10 201847
11 199845
12 200345
13 200542
14 200442
15 201642
16 201742
17 200041
18 199339
19 200136
20 200136

About Christopher Scott

Christopher Scott is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (30 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (17 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (15 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (828 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (313 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (153 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (185 citations) and Biochemistry (96 citations). Christopher Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Iain J. Clarke, Adam S. Hamlin, Hassan K. Obied, Syed Haris Omar, J. A. Rawson, A.J. Tilbrook, Alda Pereira, Gary L. Jackson, David E. Kuehl and Kamal A.S. Al-Shoumer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroendocrinology, Endocrinology, Domestic Animal Endocrinology, Reproduction Fertility and Development and Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact