Christopher P. Ames
Impact in
- Surgery top 10%
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
- Surgery 13
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 12
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 4
- Co-authors
- Robert A. Hart (3 shared papers)Justin K. Scheer (2 shared papers)Jeffrey D. Coe (2 shared papers)Rodrigo Amaral (1 shared paper)Per D. Trobisch (1 shared paper)Lloyd A. Hey (1 shared paper)Allan Clark (4 shared papers)Michael O. LaGrone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spine (4 papers)Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (2 papers)Spine Deformity (2 papers)The Spine Journal (1 paper)Neurosurgical FOCUS (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTürkiyeFrance
In The Last Decade
Christopher P. Ames
13 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Surgery 342
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 94
- Medical Laboratory Technology 1
- Pharmacology 10
- Biomedical Engineering 7
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher P. Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher P. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher P. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher P. Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher P. Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher P. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher P. Ames. The network helps show where Christopher P. Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher P. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 224 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 |
About Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 16 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (342 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (94 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (1 citation), Pharmacology (10 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (7 citations). Christopher P. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Hart, Justin K. Scheer, Jeffrey D. Coe, Rodrigo Amaral, Per D. Trobisch, Lloyd A. Hey, Allan Clark, Michael O. LaGrone, Andrew K. Cree and Jung‐Hee Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Spine Deformity, The Spine Journal and Neurosurgical FOCUS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.