Christopher Keefer

29 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Christopher Keefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Pharmacology 190
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 295
  • Pharmaceutical Science 49
  • Oncology 146
  • Organic Chemistry 167
Replace Stuart W. Paine with:
Stuart W. Paine United Kingdom
Giuliano Berellini United States
L. Cucurull-Sanchez United Kingdom
Gary DeCrescenzo United States
Carsten Schmeck Germany
Jon S. B. de Vlieger Netherlands
Ping Kang United States
Gordon Beck United Kingdom
Prajwal P. Nandekar India
Fabio Broccatelli United States
Christopher Keefer relative to Stuart W. Paine United Kingdom Stuart W. Paine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Stuart W. Paine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Keefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Keefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Keefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Keefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Keefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Keefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Keefer. The network helps show where Christopher Keefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Keefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Keefer Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Keefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017124
2 2012109
3 201363
4 201152
5 201136
6 201335
7 199932
8 202330
9 201928
10 201925
11 201625
12 202024
13 201923
14 199919
15 199818
16 202314
17 199914
18 202012
19 201612
20 201710

About Christopher Keefer

Christopher Keefer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 31 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (17 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (13 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers) and Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (190 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (295 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (49 citations), Oncology (146 citations) and Organic Chemistry (167 citations). Christopher Keefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include George Chang, Gregory W. Kauffman, Dennis O. Scott, Li Di, Susanne Winiwarter, Prashant Desai, Robert D. Bereman, Suzanne T. Purrington, Antonia F. Stepan and Holger Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact