Christopher J. Walker
Impact in
- Toxicology top 5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
-
- Doping in Sports
Papers in
-
- Doping in Sports 18
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 4
- Co-authors
- David Cowan (14 shared papers)Andrew T. Kicman (17 shared papers)Marta Di Forti (1 shared paper)Michael J. Wheeler (1 shared paper)Jim McVeigh (1 shared paper)Claire Wilson (1 shared paper)Michael J. Evans-Brown (1 shared paper)Vincenzo Abbate (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Drug Testing and Analysis (9 papers)Steroids (4 papers)Clinical Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Endocrinology (1 paper)Journal of Mass Spectrometry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Walker
24 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Toxicology 58
- Sociology and Political Science 354
- Animal Science and Zoology 45
- Pharmacology 63
- Analytical Chemistry 34
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Walker. The network helps show where Christopher J. Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 46 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 5 |
About Christopher J. Walker
Christopher J. Walker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Toxicology, Hematology, Analytical Chemistry and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (18 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting (2 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (1 paper) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (58 citations), Sociology and Political Science (354 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (45 citations), Pharmacology (63 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (34 citations). Christopher J. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Cowan, Andrew T. Kicman, Marta Di Forti, Michael J. Wheeler, Jim McVeigh, Claire Wilson, Michael J. Evans-Brown, Vincenzo Abbate, Simon John Coles and Alan D. Brailsford. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Steroids, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Endocrinology and Journal of Mass Spectrometry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.