Christopher J. McDevitt

1.6k citations
52 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher J. McDevitt

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Christopher J. McDevitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 907
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 640
  • Neurology 136
  • Sensory Systems 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 98
Replace T. Nakano with:
T. Nakano Japan
A. M. Brown United Kingdom
Gordon Chalmers United States
Samantha M. Lewis United States
K. Arisaka United States
H. Condé Sweden
Lihui Zhou Germany
R. Holzmann United States
Joel Zylberberg United States
M. Burghoff Germany
Christopher J. McDevitt relative to T. Nakano Japan T. Nakano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
T. Nakano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. McDevitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. McDevitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. McDevitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. McDevitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. McDevitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. McDevitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. McDevitt. The network helps show where Christopher J. McDevitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. McDevitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher J. McDevitt Line = papers co-authored together Christopher J. McDevitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009150
2 2008114
3 1982105
4 201076
5 201169
6 200659
7 198755
8 200939
9 200938
10 201133
11 201030
12 201527
13 198725
14 201725
15 201823
16 201919
17 201019
18 200918
19 201716
20 201415

About Christopher J. McDevitt

Christopher J. McDevitt is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (39 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (26 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (21 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (11 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (907 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (640 citations), Neurology (136 citations), Sensory Systems (59 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations). Christopher J. McDevitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include P. H. Diamond, Ö. D. Gürcan, Xian-Zhu Tang, James R. Bloedel, Timothy J. Ebner, Zehua Guo, T. S. Hahm, V. Naulin, T.S. Hahm and Weixing Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Nuclear Fusion, Physical Review Letters and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact