Christopher Eing Wee

21 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Christopher Eing Wee
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Gender Studies 40
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 23
  • Surgery 79
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 36
  • Oncology 28
Replace Tushar Garg with:
Tushar Garg United States
Mohammad Ashraf United Kingdom
Moonki Hong South Korea
Da David Jiang United States
Jared D. Huling United States
Matthew Poole United Kingdom
Michael J. Fox United States
Miral Patel United States
Ruth E. Dayhoff United States
Andrew Colucci United States
Christopher Eing Wee relative to Tushar Garg United States Tushar Garg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Tushar Garg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Eing Wee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Eing Wee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Eing Wee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Eing Wee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Eing Wee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Eing Wee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Eing Wee. The network helps show where Christopher Eing Wee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Eing Wee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Eing Wee Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Eing Wee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201955
2 201253
3 200946
4 198227
5 199327
6 202326
7 199511
8 20239
9 20217
10 20195
11 20035
12
Management of testicular germ cell tumors.
20233
13 20203
14 20192
15 20232
16 20251
17 20231
18 20241
19 20241
20 20231

About Christopher Eing Wee

Christopher Eing Wee is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (11 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (9 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (4 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (40 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (23 citations), Surgery (79 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (36 citations) and Oncology (28 citations). Christopher Eing Wee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter F. Ehrlich, Ankur R. Rana, Robert A. Drongowski, Damian J. Hussey, Olga Sukocheva, David I. Watson, R. Billinton, G. Hamoud, Harry E Fuentes and Joselle Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, Blood, Frontiers in Endocrinology and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact