Christopher E. Keefer

31 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Christopher E. Keefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Pharmacology 222
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 315
  • Pharmaceutical Science 52
  • Oncology 166
  • Organic Chemistry 173
Replace Stuart W. Paine with:
Stuart W. Paine United Kingdom
Gordon Beck United Kingdom
Carsten Schmeck Germany
Yvette M. Fobian United States
Jon S. B. de Vlieger Netherlands
Fabio Broccatelli United States
Christopher N. Luscombe United Kingdom
Mark J. Ackland United Kingdom
Catrin Hasselgren Arnby Sweden
Suresh Babu Mekapati United States
Christopher E. Keefer relative to Stuart W. Paine United Kingdom Stuart W. Paine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Stuart W. Paine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher E. Keefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher E. Keefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher E. Keefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher E. Keefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher E. Keefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher E. Keefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher E. Keefer. The network helps show where Christopher E. Keefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher E. Keefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher E. Keefer Line = papers co-authored together Christopher E. Keefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017126
2 2012125
3 201378
4 201151
5 201139
6 201335
7 199934
8 202033
9 202333
10 201931
11 202027
12 201927
13 201627
14 201925
15 199919
16 199818
17 202315
18 202015
19 199914
20 201612

About Christopher E. Keefer

Christopher E. Keefer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Oncology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Spectroscopy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (17 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (14 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (8 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (222 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (315 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (52 citations), Oncology (166 citations) and Organic Chemistry (173 citations). Christopher E. Keefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include George Chang, Gregory W. Kauffman, Dennis O. Scott, Li Di, Prashant V. Desai, Susanne Winiwarter, Antonia F. Stepan, Patrick R. Verhoest, Robert D. Bereman and Martin P. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The AAPS Journal, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact