Christopher Dalrymple

23 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Christopher Dalrymple
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 128
  • Reproductive Medicine 116
  • Dermatology 39
  • Epidemiology 138
  • Surgery 122
Replace Harrie Hollema with:
Harrie Hollema Netherlands
Fani Kokka United Kingdom
H R McClelland United Kingdom
Maki Matoda Japan
B. Black Canada
Joanna Jońska‐Gmyrek Poland
Michele Follen Mitchell United States
Linn Wölber Germany
Helmut F. Schellhas United States
Hidetaka Nomura Japan
Christopher Dalrymple relative to Harrie Hollema Netherlands Harrie Hollema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Harrie Hollema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Dalrymple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Dalrymple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Dalrymple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Dalrymple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Dalrymple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Dalrymple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Dalrymple. The network helps show where Christopher Dalrymple may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Dalrymple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Dalrymple Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Dalrymple links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199547
2 200235
3 199934
4 201233
5 200333
6 200529
7
Secondary malignancies in ovarian dermoid cyst.
200922
8 200220
9 199320
10 199514
11 199411
12 198910
13 20048
14 19908
15 20117
16 19897
17 20057
18 20026
19 20064
20 20062

About Christopher Dalrymple

Christopher Dalrymple is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (2 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (128 citations), Reproductive Medicine (116 citations), Dermatology (39 citations), Epidemiology (138 citations) and Surgery (122 citations). Christopher Dalrymple has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Carter, Philip Beale, Yvonne E. Cossart, Peter Elliott, Carol H. Thompson, Barbara Rose, Martin H.N. Tattersall, Malcolm Coppleson, Sue Valmadre and Kenneth Atkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Modern Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact