Christopher D. Pull
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Papers in
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 13
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 6
- Genetics 16
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 16
- Co-authors
- Sylvia Cremer (7 shared papers)Matthias A. Fürst (1 shared paper)Mark J. F. Brown (3 shared papers)Dino Peter McMahon (2 shared papers)Anna V. Grasse (2 shared papers)J. Robert Paxton (1 shared paper)Stephan Wolf (1 shared paper)Suzanne J. Clark (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Biology (4 papers)Trends in Ecology & Evolution (1 paper)Ecology Letters (1 paper)Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Trends in Parasitology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
Christopher D. Pull
14 papers receiving 633 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Insect Science 485
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 429
- Genetics 542
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 42
- Modeling and Simulation 7
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Pull
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Pull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Pull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Pull more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Pull
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Pull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Pull. The network helps show where Christopher D. Pull may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher D. Pull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 213 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 |
About Christopher D. Pull
Christopher D. Pull is a scholar working on Insect Science, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 16 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1 paper) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (485 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (429 citations), Genetics (542 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (42 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (7 citations). Christopher D. Pull has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia Cremer, Matthias A. Fürst, Mark J. F. Brown, Dino Peter McMahon, Anna V. Grasse, J. Robert Paxton, Stephan Wolf, Suzanne J. Clark, Ka S. Lim and Juliet L. Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology Letters, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution and Trends in Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.