Trends in Parasitology

2.5k papers and 116.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Trends in Parasitology in the last decades have received a total of 116.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Parasitology usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers), Parasitology (1.0k papers) and Ecology (478 papers) specifically the topics of Malaria Research and Control (658 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (567 papers) and Parasites and Host Interactions (485 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Parasitology are Ray M. Kaplan, Domenico Otranto, Filipe Dantas‐Torres, Robert Poulin, Graham H. Coombs, H.V. Smith, Simon L. Croft, Lorenzo Savioli, Donald P. McManus and Mark J. Costello.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Parasitology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Parasitology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Parasitology.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Parasitology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Parasitology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Parasitology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Parasitology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025