Christopher D. Bennett

42 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Christopher D. Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Philosophy 194
  • Law 144
  • Social Psychology 85
  • Sociology and Political Science 139
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 34
Replace Herbert Morris with:
Herbert Morris United States
Joshua Dressler United States
Daniel M. Farrell United States
Glen Pettigrove New Zealand
Macalester Bell United States
Noel Struchiner Brazil
Dale Dorsey United States
Adam Jason Kolber United States
Elinor Mason United Kingdom
Connie S. Rosati United States
Christopher D. Bennett relative to Herbert Morris United States Herbert Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Herbert Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Bennett. The network helps show where Christopher D. Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Christopher D. Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher D. Bennett Line = papers co-authored together Christopher D. Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200886
2 200269
3 201832
4 200330
5 201425
6 200623
7 200319
8 201418
9 202012
10 200311
11 202010
12 20169
13 20179
14 20229
15 20068
16 20047
17 20106
18 20126
19 20155
20 20215

About Christopher D. Bennett

Christopher D. Bennett is a scholar working on Philosophy, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (28 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (21 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (9 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (7 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (194 citations), Law (144 citations), Social Psychology (85 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (34 citations). Christopher D. Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philippa Tomczak, Linda Radzik, Glen Pettigrove, George Sher, Kimberley Brownlee, Robert Stern, Paul Faulkner and K. E. Løgstrup. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Political Theory, Criminal Law and Philosophy, Journal of Moral Philosophy, Philosophy & Public Affairs and Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact