Christopher C. Imes

53 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Christopher C. Imes
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 173
  • Pharmacy 62
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 62
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Physiology 191
Replace Diana A. Chirinos with:
Diana A. Chirinos United States
Bo‐Huei Huang Australia
Débora Rosa Italy
Yanping Teng United States
Timo Saaristo Finland
Robert Magner United States
Péter Torzsa Hungary
Tadahiro Ohtsu Japan
Jeremy Pomeroy United States
J C Konen United States
Christopher C. Imes relative to Diana A. Chirinos United States Diana A. Chirinos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Diana A. Chirinos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher C. Imes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher C. Imes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher C. Imes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher C. Imes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher C. Imes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher C. Imes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher C. Imes. The network helps show where Christopher C. Imes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher C. Imes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher C. Imes Line = papers co-authored together Christopher C. Imes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014104
2 201353
3 202140
4 201239
5 201537
6 202133
7 201532
8 201131
9 201530
10 202026
11 202223
12 201923
13 201822
14 202119
15 202113
16 202012
17 202112
18 201611
19 202410
20 201710

About Christopher C. Imes

Christopher C. Imes is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (15 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (12 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (8 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (173 citations), Pharmacy (62 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (62 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations) and Physiology (191 citations). Christopher C. Imes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Lora E. Burke, Eileen R. Chasens, Frances Marcus Lewis, Melissa A. Austin, Susan M. Sereika, Faith S. Luyster, Jacob K. Kariuki, Christopher E. Kline, Yaguang Zheng and Cynthia M. Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Circulation, Biological Research For Nursing, Sleep And Breathing and Public Health Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact