Christopher Brown

10.1k citations
288 papers · 7.6k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Brown

266 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Peers

Christopher Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Paleontology 731
  • Anthropology 680
  • Archeology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 802
  • Archeology 373
Replace David Dean with:
David Dean United States
Robert S. Walker United States
John G. Clement Australia
Jeffrey Dean United States
John Campbell United Kingdom
Daniel E. Lieberman United States
Liu Li China
Robert W. Mann United States
David Robinson United Kingdom
David Thompson United Kingdom
Christopher Brown relative to David Dean United States David Dean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.3×
David Dean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Brown. The network helps show where Christopher Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Brown Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 288 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005486
2 2006357
3 2003231
4 2012218
5
Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response.
2014179
6 2018179
7 2000169
8 2007168
9 1998152
10 1992149
11 2002148
12 2010131
13 1993114
14 2005102
15 201193
16 200691
17 199191
18 200385
19 201682
20 201682

About Christopher Brown

Christopher Brown is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials and Physiology, having authored 288 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (28 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (27 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (27 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (18 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (14 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (13 papers) and Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (731 citations), Anthropology (680 citations), Archeology (49 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (802 citations) and Archeology (373 citations). Christopher Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Jones, Torbjorn S. Bergstrom, Peter S. Ungar, Alan Walker, Mark F. Teaford, Robert S. Scott, Wael El‐Deredy, Richard G. Compton, Frederick E. Grine and Tomasz Bartkowiak. Their work appears in journals such as CIRP Annals, Journal of Economic Issues, Pain, European Journal of Pain and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact