Christina E. Squires

453 citations
9 papers · 356 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Christina E. Squires

9 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Christina E. Squires
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 262
  • Cancer Research 94
  • Oncology 84
  • Aging 5
  • Molecular Biology 153
Replace Michael J. Daseke with:
Michael J. Daseke United States
Upendra Chalise United States
Krista L. Bathe Canada
Rajika Roy United States
Christine Delage France
Baosheng Li United States
Bingong Li China
Indroneal Banerjee United States
Edith Renaud-Gabardos France
E. Fleck Germany
Christina E. Squires relative to Michael J. Daseke United States Michael J. Daseke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Michael J. Daseke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christina E. Squires

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christina E. Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christina E. Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christina E. Squires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christina E. Squires

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christina E. Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christina E. Squires. The network helps show where Christina E. Squires may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Christina E. Squires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christina E. Squires Line = papers co-authored together Christina E. Squires links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2004135
2 2005107
3 200548
4 200636
5 200719
6 20066
7 19942
8 20042
9 20061

About Christina E. Squires

Christina E. Squires is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (4 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (262 citations), Cancer Research (94 citations), Oncology (84 citations), Aging (5 citations) and Molecular Biology (153 citations). Christina E. Squires has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Merry L. Lindsey, Joseph T. Mingoia, Francis G. Spinale, Gustavo Escobar, J.C. Hendrick, Sarah E. Sweterlitsch, Rosalia Leonardi, William M. Yarbrough, Robert E. Stroud and Julie E. McLean. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact