Christina E. Acker

11 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Christina E. Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Surgery 601
  • Family Practice 22
  • Physiology 208
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 175
  • Emergency Medical Services 48
Replace E. G. G. Verdaasdonk with:
E. G. G. Verdaasdonk Netherlands
S Bann United Kingdom
Lelan F. Sillin United States
Guilherme Pena Australia
Ross E. Willis United States
David Hananel United States
Simon Bann United Kingdom
Vivek Datta United Kingdom
Esther M. Bonrath Canada
Ravindar S. Sidhu Canada
Christina E. Acker relative to E. G. G. Verdaasdonk Netherlands E. G. G. Verdaasdonk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E. G. G. Verdaasdonk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christina E. Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christina E. Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christina E. Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christina E. Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christina E. Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christina E. Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christina E. Acker. The network helps show where Christina E. Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Christina E. Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christina E. Acker Line = papers co-authored together Christina E. Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010244
2 2008127
3 2011122
4 201074
5 200864
6 201050
7 201143
8 201017
9
The prophylactic use of a topical scar gel containing extract of Allium cepae, allantoin, and heparin improves symptoms and appearance of cesarean-section scars compared with untreated scars.
201417
10 20083
11 20091

About Christina E. Acker

Christina E. Acker is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper) and Space Exploration and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (601 citations), Family Practice (22 citations), Physiology (208 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (175 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (48 citations). Christina E. Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dimitrios Stefanidis, Mark W. Scerbo, B. Todd Heniford, Yuliya Yurko, Ajita S. Prabhu, Paul N. Montero, Frederick L. Greene, Warren D. Smith, Warren Smith and Hoang-Phuong Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of surgical education, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, The American Surgeon, Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare and Surgical Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact