Chris Roebuck
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 4
- COVID-19 and healthcare impacts 4
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 1
- Healthcare Systems and Challenges 1
- Co-authors
- John Deanfield (6 shared papers)Mamas A. Mamas (6 shared papers)Mark de Belder (6 shared papers)Chris P Gale (5 shared papers)Tom Denwood (6 shared papers)T F Luescher (2 shared papers)Barbara Casadei (2 shared papers)Eva Morris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet (2 papers)Journal of the American Heart Association (1 paper)Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions (1 paper)Mayo Clinic Proceedings (1 paper)Heart (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Roebuck
6 papers receiving 661 citations
Chris Roebuck's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Oncology 372
- Infectious Diseases 116
- Emergency Medicine 51
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 97
- General Health Professions 99
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Roebuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Roebuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Roebuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Roebuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Roebuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Roebuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Roebuck. The network helps show where Chris Roebuck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Roebuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in England Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 438 |
| 2 | 2020 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 6 | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admission rates for, and management of, acute coronary syndromes in England. | 2020 | 2 |
About Chris Roebuck
Chris Roebuck is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (1 paper), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (372 citations), Infectious Diseases (116 citations), Emergency Medicine (51 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (97 citations) and General Health Professions (99 citations). Chris Roebuck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Deanfield, Mamas A. Mamas, Mark de Belder, Chris P Gale, Tom Denwood, T F Luescher, Barbara Casadei, Eva Morris, Martin Landray and Rory Collins. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Heart Association, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, Mayo Clinic Proceedings and Heart.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.