Chris Geraets

1.1k citations
24 papers · 616 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Geraets

21 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers

Chris Geraets
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Human-Computer Interaction 183
  • Applied Psychology 168
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 195
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 158
  • Conservation 31
Replace Roos Pot-Kolder with:
Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands
Poppy Brown United Kingdom
Simon Riches United Kingdom
María Vicenta Navarro Haro Spain
Joan Ribas‐Sabaté Spain
Ştefan Szamosközi Romania
Alexis Bourla France
Jamie R. Pogue United States
Andrew Levihn‐Coon United States
Stéphanie Dumoulin Canada
Chris Geraets relative to Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands Roos Pot-Kolder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roos Pot-Kolder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Geraets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Geraets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Geraets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Geraets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Geraets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Geraets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Geraets. The network helps show where Chris Geraets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Geraets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Geraets Line = papers co-authored together Chris Geraets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018155
2 202192
3 202054
4 202054
5 201952
6 202142
7 201730
8 201929
9 202028
10 202021
11 202216
12 202214
13 201613
14 20234
15 20213
16 20242
17 20232
18 20232
19 20241
20 20171

About Chris Geraets

Chris Geraets is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (183 citations), Applied Psychology (168 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (195 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (158 citations) and Conservation (31 citations). Chris Geraets has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wim Veling, Roos Pot-Kolder, Mark van der Gaag, Marije van Beilen, Anton B. P. Staring, Elisabeth C. D. van der Stouwe, Harm J. Gijsman, Philippe Delespaul, Saskia Anne Nijman and Stéphanie Klein Tuente. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, BMC Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact