Chris Geraets

22 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers

Chris Geraets
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Human-Computer Interaction 203
  • Applied Psychology 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 147
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Conservation 24
Replace Roos Pot-Kolder with:
Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands
Poppy Brown United Kingdom
Simon Riches United Kingdom
María Vicenta Navarro Haro Spain
Ştefan Szamosközi Romania
Laura Dellazizzo Canada
Joan Ribas‐Sabaté Spain
Emily Carl United States
Jamie R. Pogue United States
Andrew Levihn‐Coon United States
Chris Geraets relative to Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands Roos Pot-Kolder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roos Pot-Kolder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Geraets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Geraets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Geraets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Geraets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Geraets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Geraets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Geraets. The network helps show where Chris Geraets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Geraets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Geraets Line = papers co-authored together Chris Geraets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018170
2 2021104
3 202059
4 201955
5 202055
6 202149
7 201733
8 201932
9 202029
10 202025
11 202221
12 202218
13 201618
14 20236
15 20214
16 20234
17 20243
18 20243
19 20252
20 20232

About Chris Geraets

Chris Geraets is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Human-Computer Interaction, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (203 citations), Applied Psychology (133 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (147 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations) and Conservation (24 citations). Chris Geraets has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wim Veling, Roos Pot-Kolder, Mark van der Gaag, Marije van Beilen, Anton B. P. Staring, Elisabeth C. D. van der Stouwe, Philippe Delespaul, Harm J. Gijsman, Saskia Anne Nijman and Stéphanie Klein Tuente. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact