Chou‐Ping Chiou

23 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Chou‐Ping Chiou
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Nephrology 55
  • Family Practice 11
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 84
  • Applied Psychology 25
  • Research and Theory 3
Replace Ioannis Κoutelekos with:
Ioannis Κoutelekos Greece
Türkinaz Aştı Türkiye
Hsing‐Mei Chen Taiwan
Marianne Saragosa Canada
Georgia Fasoi Greece
Azhar Farooqi United Kingdom
Linda S. Baas United States
Nahid Shahgholian Iran
Masumeh Hemmati Maslakpak Iran
Nader Aghakhani Iran
Chou‐Ping Chiou relative to Ioannis Κoutelekos Greece Ioannis Κoutelekos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ioannis Κoutelekos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chou‐Ping Chiou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chou‐Ping Chiou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chou‐Ping Chiou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chou‐Ping Chiou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chou‐Ping Chiou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chou‐Ping Chiou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chou‐Ping Chiou. The network helps show where Chou‐Ping Chiou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Chou‐Ping Chiou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chou‐Ping Chiou Line = papers co-authored together Chou‐Ping Chiou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009105
2 201152
3 201149
4 200629
5 200828
6 201127
7 201024
8 201524
9 200721
10 199820
11 200719
12 200012
13
[Hopelessness: a concept analysis].
200412
14 201811
15 202210
16 20229
17 20238
18 20107
19 20143
20 19993

About Chou‐Ping Chiou

Chou‐Ping Chiou is a scholar working on Nephrology, Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (55 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (84 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Chou‐Ping Chiou has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yong‐Yuan Chang, Chi Wang, Huey‐Shyan Lin, Hsueh-Hsing Pan, Pei‐Ling Tang, Ming‐Shium Tu, Chi-Yin Wong, Chien‐Jen Hsu, Hing‐Chung Lam and Bih‐O Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Nursing Research, Cancer Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact