Chloé Schmidt
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Ecology top 10%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Colin J. Garroway (18 shared papers)Sean Hoban (4 shared papers)Ivan Paz‐Vinas (5 shared papers)Margaret E. Hunter (5 shared papers)Michael Domaratzki (1 shared paper)Jeff Bowman (1 shared paper)Jenny Q. Ouyang (1 shared paper)Caroline Isaksson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Evolution (2 papers)Molecular Ecology (2 papers)Conservation Biology (2 papers)Journal of Avian Biology (1 paper)Trends in Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Chloé Schmidt
26 papers receiving 535 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Ecological Modeling 128
- Ecology 244
- Genetics 227
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 90
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 101
Countries citing papers authored by Chloé Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé Schmidt. The network helps show where Chloé Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloé Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 |
About Chloé Schmidt
Chloé Schmidt is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (128 citations), Ecology (244 citations), Genetics (227 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (90 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (101 citations). Chloé Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. Garroway, Sean Hoban, Ivan Paz‐Vinas, Margaret E. Hunter, Michael Domaratzki, Jeff Bowman, Jenny Q. Ouyang, Caroline Isaksson, Frances Bonier and Davide M. Dominoni. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Molecular Ecology, Conservation Biology, Journal of Avian Biology and Trends in Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.