Ching‐Li Tseng

2.9k citations
90 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Li Tseng

87 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Ching‐Li Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Pharmaceutical Science 382
  • Biomaterials 509
  • Ophthalmology 231
  • Molecular Medicine 102
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 425
Replace Yao Fu with:
Yao Fu China
Kaihui Nan China
Hu Yang United States
Abhirup Mandal United States
Chun Gwon Park South Korea
Ilva D. Rupenthal New Zealand
Armando Silva‐Cunha Brazil
Jingxin Gou China
Jae Wook Yang South Korea
Zhanrong Li China
Ching‐Li Tseng relative to Yao Fu China Yao Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Yao Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Li Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Li Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Li Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Li Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Li Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Li Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Li Tseng. The network helps show where Ching‐Li Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Li Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Li Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Li Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009207
2 2018174
3 2008111
4 201897
5 202090
6 201179
7 202172
8 200563
9 202360
10 201858
11 201856
12 201354
13 201052
14 201646
15 201946
16 201942
17 201640
18 201740
19 201940
20 201939

About Ching‐Li Tseng

Ching‐Li Tseng is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Biomaterials and Molecular Biology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (25 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (23 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (15 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (10 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (382 citations), Biomaterials (509 citations), Ophthalmology (231 citations), Molecular Medicine (102 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (425 citations). Ching‐Li Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Feng‐Huei Lin, Wen‐Yu Su, Kai‐Chiang Yang, I‐Chan Lin, Guei‐Sheung Liu, Thierry Burnouf, Ko-Chung Yen, Ko-Hua Chen, Peng‐Yuan Wang and Chi-Chang Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmaceutics, Biomaterials, Polymers, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact