Ching‐Li Tseng

3.0k citations
94 papers · 2.5k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Li Tseng

90 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Ching‐Li Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Pharmaceutical Science 392
  • Biomaterials 567
  • Ophthalmology 205
  • Molecular Medicine 110
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 390
Replace Vibhuti Agrahari with:
Vibhuti Agrahari United States
Abhirup Mandal United States
Chun Gwon Park South Korea
Yao Fu China
Steve Brocchini United Kingdom
Armando Silva‐Cunha Brazil
Jingxin Gou China
Hu Yang United States
Zhanrong Li China
Kaihui Nan China
Ching‐Li Tseng relative to Vibhuti Agrahari United States Vibhuti Agrahari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Vibhuti Agrahari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Li Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Li Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Li Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Li Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Li Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Li Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Li Tseng. The network helps show where Ching‐Li Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Li Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Li Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Li Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009231
2 2018194
3 2008134
4 2018100
5 202094
6 201180
7 202175
8 202365
9 200564
10 201860
11 201359
12 201859
13 201058
14 201650
15 201949
16 201947
17 201943
18 201942
19 201342
20 201742

About Ching‐Li Tseng

Ching‐Li Tseng is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Biomaterials and Molecular Biology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (24 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (22 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (17 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (10 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (392 citations), Biomaterials (567 citations), Ophthalmology (205 citations), Molecular Medicine (110 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (390 citations). Ching‐Li Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Feng‐Huei Lin, Wen‐Yu Su, Kai‐Chiang Yang, I‐Chan Lin, Guei‐Sheung Liu, Thierry Burnouf, Ko-Chung Yen, Peng‐Yuan Wang, Ko-Hua Chen and Chi-Chang Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmaceutics, Biomaterials, Polymers, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and International Journal of Nanomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact