Ching-Kit Chan

2.1k citations
23 papers · 1.5k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ching-Kit Chan

23 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ching-Kit Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 242
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 13
  • Materials Chemistry 605
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 100
Replace M. V. Fistul with:
M. V. Fistul Germany
K. D. Maranowski United States
L. Chotorlishvili Germany
Jacek Kasprzak France
N. Kumada Japan
Peter P. Orth United States
E. L. Ivchenko Russia
F. Portier France
Greg Salamo United States
Stefan Kundermann Switzerland
Ching-Kit Chan relative to M. V. Fistul Germany M. V. Fistul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
M. V. Fistul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching-Kit Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching-Kit Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching-Kit Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching-Kit Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching-Kit Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching-Kit Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching-Kit Chan. The network helps show where Ching-Kit Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching-Kit Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching-Kit Chan Line = papers co-authored together Ching-Kit Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017289
2 2016260
3 2017228
4 2016144
5 2014128
6 201692
7 201568
8 201061
9 200942
10 201432
11 201432
12 202222
13 201720
14 201313
15 20118
16 20137
17 20186
18 20063
19 20123
20
Anisotropic Fermi liquid theory of fermionic polar molecules
20091

About Ching-Kit Chan

Ching-Kit Chan is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (8 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (242 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (13 citations), Materials Chemistry (605 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (100 citations). Ching-Kit Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Tony E. Lee, Patrick A. Lee, Nuh Gedik, Netanel H. Lindner, Gil Refael, Jung Hoon Han, Shenshen Wang, Zhanybek Alpichshev, Dillon Gardner and Young Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Nature Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B. and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact